184 tainted jury pool - editorialpinups

These questions have the same answer.

1. What is a sellout crowd at a Washington Nationals game?

2. What is a sellout crowd at a Washington NFL football game?

3. What is a sellout crowd at a Washington Capitals game?

4. What is a sellout crowd at a Washington Wizards game?

5. What is a sellout crowd at a D.C. United game?

6. What is a sellout crowd at a Washington Spirit game?

7. What is a sellout crowd at a Capital City Go-Go game?

8. What is a sellout crowd at a DC Shadow game?

9. What is a sellout crowd at a DC Defenders game?

Answer: A tainted jury pool. (I left off the Washington Mystics because many attendees might  be Indiana Fever fans looking to see Caitlin Clark play).

Six Democrats made a video encouraging Armed Services members to resist directives from the commander in chief, the President of the United States, and the Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.  President Trump had said that these six individuals worked in concert and are “Traitors to our country”.

Many people have also seen the presentation by the six and had questioned the legal validity of what they stated along with possible treasnous implications.  Some compared to crying fire in a packed movie theater when there was no fire.  Others questioned this presentation to be in violation of swearing to uphold the constitution. I have not seen too many current and former military in the flyover territory speak positively of what the six did.

In August 2025 I wrote that Washington DC should be split of its residents giving the residential land back to Maryland and Virginia as the purpose of the land given was for a government that had legislators meet every other year and only get paid a stipends for legislative meetings. The federal government was never meant to be a career, but a time in life for service to the country, then back to the original occupation. Government was not be be an occupation and not tobe a lobbying ooccupation when leaving government.

The same logic is for the judiciary.  The current state of all courts in DC is there is a very biased judiciary.  Too many cases can go before people as jurors that have professional implications when serving on various juries.  With the highest majority of voters in the country that vote for one party, it is mostly impossible for someone from the other party to get a fair shake.  It does not matter if this is perception or reality, it must be avoided at all costs.  Also, the DC Judiciary seems to be so biased htat it is criminal.  After writing this I will be staying away fron DC.

To solve this there should be no DC district courts.  The district needs to be broken and split to other jurisdictions.  It should also be made easier for to change venues, not for judge shopping, but to get to a less biased jury pool.

Would the six legislators have a different result if their grand juries came from a different playground? There are no guarantees of that.  But eliminating the location of the grand juries and the judicial activity away from the career bureaucrats would bring less risk of the tainted jury that would be available to protect one of its own and return the judgment to a fair and honest jury that did not have financial interests in the game.